The destruction of slavery... missing pages?

Hey everyone im just posting to ask if anyone had pages 46 and 47 missing from their article the destruction of slavery. I just noticed it today and wanted to make sure i wasn't the only one. send me an email at mizzmichelle18@yahoo.com if you have these pages missing also.

Civl War: Our choosing of articles

I'm pretty shy person in class and I don't like to talk that much. I wanted to explain my articles here plus give an example of our todays war. I read two articles one from the North and one from the south. They both were attacking eachother about the causes of the war. North wanted Tariffs Slavery and state rights to be gone and the opposite goes for the South. While thinking of this I put it into todays standards and went out of the box for a little bit. I may go off topic but its something I wanted to share with everyone. The belief of slavery in the civil war was important but I don't belive that was the exact goal for united states to end it. I know it was important but everytime there is a war its always about money. In what I believe the underlying truth to the whole Civil War was Tariffs and State Rights. These both were hated by some politcal officals. They wanted a way to take them away because Tariff had to high taxes put on and State Rights wasn't exactly put well. Now comes something I wanted to discuss. Throughout the years there has been many wars and many issues. George Bush went to war because he wanted to defeat "Terror" which he thought Iraq had Nuclear weapons. That was a bullshit lie and people who believed it are dumb. The truth was he wanted to go after Hussien and his oil. People get manipulated by media so many times... Whats to believe anymore. Now I ask am I right or everything falls down by choice or by nature?

Civil War necessay?

I think that the South was never willing to give up slavery to the North. The Civil War pushed the South to realize the it wasn't right for the country to become seperated over slavery. The beginning of the civil war definately gave slavery a push out the door because the North had way more soilders on their side then the South. Either way slavery would never have lasted longer than it did due to the North's actions in the Civil War.

Civil War: Necessary?

So readers, after thinking through Seward, Calhoun and Lincoln, do you think there was some way the Civil War could ahve been avoided? Do you think slavery could have come to an end w/o war? If so, how long would it take? Would five (or ten or fifty) more years of slavery have been better than war?

Thanks for the invitation, prf. Swihart. See u 2morrow